And, as it turns out, geology is providing evidence that "climate change" is driven in part by forces external to the planet.
In the case of this article in Nature "Theory of chaotic orbital variations confirmed by Cretaceous geological evidence" by Stephen Meyers.
It would also appear that Meyers is a "denier" as he links to "Analysis of “Scientists: Here’s What Really Causes Climate Change (And It Has Nothing To Do With Human Beings)" from his University of Wisconsin web page. (Poor guy living in Putin's "Kremlin East" - probably has his effigy burned at least once a week by his colleagues and students...)
There is also plenty of diverse commentary on the above link here.
But what is really interesting to me is that, like "global dimming" which I wrote about a decade ago (recent link here), chaotic planetary orbits is yet another significant element missing entirely from the "climate change" models.
More interesting still is that Meyers puts his research out in the open with AstroChron: "... [a] computational platform for conducting, and learning about: (1) paleoclimate time series analysis, (2) astronomical time scale construction, and (3) the statistical integration of astrochronologies with other geochronologic/chronostratigraphic data (e.g., radioisotopic geochronology)."
This means, of course, that hackers can simply download is code rather than steal it as they did from the East Anglia climate research center.
So as science uncovers more and more factors that make climate science an"undecided" science, er, rather, just a "science" (remember boys and girls that climate science is "decided science" because all the details are fully and completely understood) it would seem that "decided" is growing less and less "decided" by the day
"Climate scientists" are, after all, not geologists, nor are they astrophysicists.
So why would these so called "climate scientists" even bother to look into other fields?
As it turns out, based on a growing body of evidence, they don't, nor do they care to.
Nor should they - they know everything there is to know about "climate change..."
(Except what they don't know apparently...)
Meaning, of course, that nothing is decided as of yet about how our climate actually works.
In any case the damage is done.
Climate science is a religion, not a science. You must believe or you're a "denier."
Don't believe me?
Speaking in California, former Obama EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy admits, “climate change has become a religion — a politically induced religion”.
GINA MCCARTHY: “I don’t know why climate change got to be a religion instead of a simple fact based science exercise but I do know that the actions that California is taking and others will make the difference between whether we stand still or fall back or move forward. […] I do see that states are actually making these investments. The challenge I think we have is for some reason climate change has become a religion — a politically induced religion instead of science fact that now we have to embrace and move forward on.”
Conversation with former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy
California Senate Democrats
February 8, 2017
More interesting still is that Meyers puts his research out in the open with AstroChron: "... [a] computational platform for conducting, and learning about: (1) paleoclimate time series analysis, (2) astronomical time scale construction, and (3) the statistical integration of astrochronologies with other geochronologic/chronostratigraphic data (e.g., radioisotopic geochronology)."
This means, of course, that hackers can simply download is code rather than steal it as they did from the East Anglia climate research center.
So as science uncovers more and more factors that make climate science an
"Climate scientists" are, after all, not geologists, nor are they astrophysicists.
So why would these so called "climate scientists" even bother to look into other fields?
As it turns out, based on a growing body of evidence, they don't, nor do they care to.
Nor should they - they know everything there is to know about "climate change..."
(Except what they don't know apparently...)
Meaning, of course, that nothing is decided as of yet about how our climate actually works.
In any case the damage is done.
Climate science is a religion, not a science. You must believe or you're a "denier."
Don't believe me?
Speaking in California, former Obama EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy admits, “climate change has become a religion — a politically induced religion”.
GINA MCCARTHY: “I don’t know why climate change got to be a religion instead of a simple fact based science exercise but I do know that the actions that California is taking and others will make the difference between whether we stand still or fall back or move forward. […] I do see that states are actually making these investments. The challenge I think we have is for some reason climate change has become a religion — a politically induced religion instead of science fact that now we have to embrace and move forward on.”
Conversation with former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy
California Senate Democrats
February 8, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment