The world is awash with "fake" science and "fake" news.
Here's good documentation of how fake science is created and marketed:
http://io9.gizmodo.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800
The scribd version of the original is here.
The original journal, after accepting and publishing the "fake" study then did this (retracted it and claimed it was never published via some controversy): Here's the cached "published" version...
In any case if you actually took the time to read through what was done you can see how easy it is to "fake" numbers. This is not new and I have written about it often over the years.
Of course, "fake" news is even easier to create as there isn't any kind of "peer review" available to screen out nonsense. At least the "fake" science world pretends to do this.
Here's a news example from Facebook. "Trump" news about leaking classified information to the president of the Philippines: (as of 5/29/17 you can find the content here http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN18K15Y - but it will probably change again.)
This is not news... It's a game.
A game to fool the ignorant and stupid.
What more proof do you need?
Demonstrable "fake" science.
"Fake" news that edits itself (I am sure more than me pointed this out).
Good thing this was "corroborated by someone who has actually led SSBN ops" - except all the content is now gone. No one says anything about this I can find.
Here's good documentation of how fake science is created and marketed:
http://io9.gizmodo.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800
The scribd version of the original is here.
The original journal, after accepting and publishing the "fake" study then did this (retracted it and claimed it was never published via some controversy): Here's the cached "published" version...
In any case if you actually took the time to read through what was done you can see how easy it is to "fake" numbers. This is not new and I have written about it often over the years.
Of course, "fake" news is even easier to create as there isn't any kind of "peer review" available to screen out nonsense. At least the "fake" science world pretends to do this.
Here's a news example from Facebook. "Trump" news about leaking classified information to the president of the Philippines: (as of 5/29/17 you can find the content here http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN18K15Y - but it will probably change again.)
If you look I quote a specific line from the article. But today, some several days later, the Reuters.com article now says only this:
"U.S. President Donald Trump told his Philippine counterpart that Washington has sent two nuclear submarines to waters off the Korean peninsula, the New York Times said, comments likely to raise questions about his handling of sensitive information.
Trump has said "a major, major conflict" with North Korea is possible because of its nuclear and missile programs and that all options are on the table but that he wants to resolve the crisis diplomatically.
North Korea has vowed to develop a missile mounted with a nuclear warhead that can strike the mainland United States, saying the program is necessary to counter U.S. aggression."
(There was a section trashing Trump and another section describing how someone had gotten "an accurate representation of the call" as I quote above - now it's, surprise, surprise, "anonymous").
Poof!
Gone. Just like that! The silly fake news parts have magically changed; though no "sources" are even identified to explain what is said...
The original date "Wed May 24, 2017 | 3:25 PM EDT" has not changed but the content has! The original Facebook post is actually dated before the current time stamp so it's probably not the first change:
A game to fool the ignorant and stupid.
What more proof do you need?
Demonstrable "fake" science.
"Fake" news that edits itself (I am sure more than me pointed this out).
Good thing this was "corroborated by someone who has actually led SSBN ops" - except all the content is now gone. No one says anything about this I can find.
No comments:
Post a Comment