Has anyone seen any sort of scientific proof that “social distancing” works in the case of Covid19?
Sure, common sense says that if you isolate someone in an environment where there is no access to a particular pathogen that person will not get the pathogen.
However, even in the case of an N95 mask we know that 5% of virus size particle still pass through.
Even an ISO Class 1 clean room (https://www.cedengineering.com/userfiles/HVAC%20Design%20for%20Cleanroom%20Facilities.pdf) is going to let through viral particles.
Basically you aren’t safe anywhere…
And, as the news reports, the infection rates are much, much higher than we were told: https://news.usc.edu/168987/antibody-testing-results-covid-19-infections-los-angeles-county/
So one has to ask whether or not social distancing and “lock downs” do anything at all...
After all, despite lock downs, somehow the virus spread in California and New York, and much more than anyone expected.
So do they work at all?
I would say no.
(Show me the science! Crickets....)
And I am not the only one.
No scientific evidence they work: neither for lock downs or social distancing.
Then there is this: https://www.kusi.com/usc-professor-joel-hay-says-there-is-no-scientific-proof-social-distancing-prevents-spread-of-coronavirus/ (well worth the time to watch).
He confirms what I am saying and, oh look, he’s a real scientist… (https://profiles.sc-ctsi.org/joel.hay)
He even studies economics and pandemics.
And more naysayers will come.
It’s all a crock.
Yet here's what we see in the "electronic media" about "science:"
Sure, common sense says that if you isolate someone in an environment where there is no access to a particular pathogen that person will not get the pathogen.
However, even in the case of an N95 mask we know that 5% of virus size particle still pass through.
Even an ISO Class 1 clean room (https://www.cedengineering.com/userfiles/HVAC%20Design%20for%20Cleanroom%20Facilities.pdf) is going to let through viral particles.
Basically you aren’t safe anywhere…
And, as the news reports, the infection rates are much, much higher than we were told: https://news.usc.edu/168987/antibody-testing-results-covid-19-infections-los-angeles-county/
So one has to ask whether or not social distancing and “lock downs” do anything at all...
After all, despite lock downs, somehow the virus spread in California and New York, and much more than anyone expected.
So do they work at all?
I would say no.
(Show me the science! Crickets....)
And I am not the only one.
No scientific evidence they work: neither for lock downs or social distancing.
Then there is this: https://www.kusi.com/usc-professor-joel-hay-says-there-is-no-scientific-proof-social-distancing-prevents-spread-of-coronavirus/ (well worth the time to watch).
He confirms what I am saying and, oh look, he’s a real scientist… (https://profiles.sc-ctsi.org/joel.hay)
He even studies economics and pandemics.
And more naysayers will come.
It’s all a crock.
Yet here's what we see in the "electronic media" about "science:"
It's banned...
Think about this.
Think about this.
Science is banned because we all believe in science, don't we...???
But "science" is the new religion, right?
(Perhaps we simply feel better believing in what we pretend science to be because...???)
And it works both ways. Now you're on the PC band wagon and you said "don't worry about the Covid" before so you use copyright takedowns to silence yourself: https://www.thewrap.com/dr-drew-supercut-covid-19-downplay-youtube-copyright-takedown/
Silence yourself?
Hmmm... Perhaps your ideas weren't so good before, or is now?
Just stupid
ReplyDelete