Maybe Jill should investigate the Democratic Primary? |
This is a national solicitation that crosses state lines.
- Is Jill Stein breaking any election laws?
- Are the her new "donations" all from the US? Where's the audit of this?
- Are there any campaign finance limits being exceeded? Again, where's the audit Jill?
- Why does her need for
untraceable cashyour moneyfundscontinue to increase (even beyond her total campaign contributions for the 2016 election)? - The alleged purpose of the use of funds on the former campaign site is now to insure the integrity of our elections - not elect Jill Stein. How can this be right? It's an election site, not an election integrity site? Sounds more like bait and switch to me...
- In Pennsylvania, at least, there doesn't appear to be any obvious or easy path for recounts. Sure seems like "false advertising" to me conflating supposed "election" with "election integrity" for big money... Is this really about integrity or simply carrying water for Hillary (in which case we are running an election site for Hillary - is this even legal)?
- She represents knowledge of supposed foreign hacking via a "cyber security expert" - J. Alex Halderman - but this is really nothing other than supposition without evidence. Like saying "aliens did it" so send me money. Here's his C-SPAN interview: https://www.c-span.org/video/?415879-4/washington-journal-j-alex-halderman-cybersecurity-voting-machines. (Note that this interview occurred on October 4th, 2016 so this is nothing new or exciting.) Should our election system be gamed in this way?
- Jill's sources of funding for the recount have some interesting properties (do we want our elections funded this way?): http://alexanderhiggins.com/soros-bot-funding-stein-recount-campaign-steady-rate-160k-per-hour/
The premise here is that some election device might be hacked - no doubt by Russians or aliens. No chance people might have simply changed their minds about the value of voting for the left...
Poor J. Alex Halderman seems to forget that there are also people running these elections. People who take what they are doing very serious (no doubt they have taken oaths in some if not all cases).
So his suppositions supersede the existing election infrastructure, which should be discarded and replaced, but with what Mr. Halderman? I worked for a guy in the 1980's who was into this for Pennsylvania. Believe me, they spent a long time figuring out the best thing for electronic voting (probably when you were still in diapers). Only recently did we switch from mechanical voting machines to electronic.
So his suppositions supersede the existing election infrastructure, which should be discarded and replaced, but with what Mr. Halderman? I worked for a guy in the 1980's who was into this for Pennsylvania. Believe me, they spent a long time figuring out the best thing for electronic voting (probably when you were still in diapers). Only recently did we switch from mechanical voting machines to electronic.
The Spanish Inquisition?
Hanging chads?
Why not have a full stadium of people, then one at a time display each ballot on the Jumbotron. Then have the stadium vote on whether or not the little black circle is in the correct box. Then a twenty hour debate over what the voter "intended"... Then on to the next vote.
At least that what Jill Stein thinks needs to happen...
Jill is not suggesting to take the money she bilked out of the snowflakes and buy secure, 100% infallible election machines...
Nope.
She just wants to check up on your state because its not as blue safe for elections like her state...
Just by meddling about in this way she could, for example, cause the at least the Wisconsin recount to extend beyond the Electoral College deadline of 12/19/2016 and invalidate the entire state of Wisconsin's vote.
Thanks Jill, now my vote no longer counts because someone "might" have done something...
So if Jill finds a problems what do we do? Go back and investigate Obama's election? Reopen Al Gore's contest in Florida?
Jill "promises" this is not the purpose of what she is doing... No, not at all. But she is dishonest about where all this leads. Only one single voice needs to start crying foul and the entire US election system will collapse.
That's where this all ends... You vote is gone.
This is a trick and so far it has separated fools from millions of dollars through, at a minimum in my opinion, false advertising.
Next Jill will try and separate you from your vote.
(Should Jill be accountable in the same way as she is asking the election infrastructure to be?)
(Should Jill be accountable in the same way as she is asking the election infrastructure to be?)
If you feel this Jill Stein is wrong and is stepping outside the boundaries of what the election laws were intended to do in order to promote her agenda and cancel your vote I urge you to contact the FBI.
Ask them to investigate Jill, her funds solicitations and her "election integrity" activities.
Milwaukee
3600 S. Lake Drive
St. Francis, WI 53235
milwaukee.fbi.gov
(414) 276-4684
Pittsburgh
3311 East Carson Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15203
pittsburgh.fbi.gov
(412) 432-4000
Detroit
477 Michigan Ave., 26th Floor
Detroit, MI 48226
detroit.fbi.gov
(313) 965-2323
Federal Election Commission
Instructions for filing a complaint here:
http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/complain.shtml#filing
Federal Election Commission
Instructions for filing a complaint here:
http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/complain.shtml#filing
As always I am interested in the impact of politics on vaping. I don't think this is good. Bernie to me represented a direct shot at changing the Senate via the HELP committee (which also has NC Senator Burr). Trump has clearly stated an anti-regulation stance which would hopefully translate into wiping out the FDA deeming regs.
EDIT: Some confirmation perhaps: http://janderresearch.blogspot.com/2016/11/there-will-be-no-recount-in.html?m=1
EDIT: Some confirmation perhaps: http://janderresearch.blogspot.com/2016/11/there-will-be-no-recount-in.html?m=1