Autopsies Of the Conformant

Found this interesting gem today.  This guy is a medical doctor performing autopsies on "post jab" "patients" (dead people).

Well worth the time to watch...

https://rumble.com/vm7z6l-autopsy-results-of-the-vaccinated-must-see.html

FDA: Booster Testimony of Doctors with Corroboration

Attached is a video from the FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting of September 17, 2021.

At this meeting the vote was 16 to 2 against boosters.

Listen to what a number of doctors presented and form your own opinion (please click on the links to view the videos as Google will not allow these videos or embed them):

And here's an actual example of what can happen:

NCAA STUDENT GOLFER HAS HEART DISEASE AFTER COVID SHOT - OFFERED BRIBE TO SILENCE STORY

And this report is apparently one of thousands...

PROJECT VERITAS RECEIVING "THOUSANDS" OF EMAILS FROM COVID-19 VACCINE WHISTLEBLOWERS

Covid: What You Don't Know Will Kill You

Although Covid-19 is driving cancer diagnosis to record lows you shouldn't worry.

After all, as I have written here before, Covid-19 eclipses all other diseases (see https://lwgat.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-covid-mass-hysteria-in-colorado.html).  And by "eclipse" I means wipes off the face of the earth.  (See flu cases go to zero in the above link... that's right zero...)

And this study, from Quest diagnostics, shows that not only does Covid-19 stop the flu and cancer, but it even causes a decline in cancer diagnosis.

What does this mean?

It's hard to say but most likely people who now embrace the "jab" have also embraced the notion that nothing else in the world but the "jab" matters.  Hence to need to go to the doctors office, no need to go to a restaurant, no need to go anywhere, and certainly no need to go to the doctors office for diagnostic tests.

On the other hand medicine kills lots of people every year (nearly 800,000 in the US as indicated in this paper).  

So maybe those not getting diagnosed with cancer will live longer...?

But the real question is how many deaths will be attributed to Covid-19?

And how many to the Covid-19 vaccines...

And will vaccine deaths help to double the number medicine kills?

Here's a few insights in this regard:

Renowned Pathologist: Myocarditis Diagnoses Should Halt Covid Vaccine (Interview)

https://rairfoundation.com/renowned-pathologist-myocarditis-diagnoses-should-halt-covid-vaccine-interview/

Video here: https://rumble.com/viq6u5-dr.-roger-hodkinson.html?fbclid=IwAR0pVeGoFASUY40Fiv9vQj9rGiH_-FxlgORWdl46fb6UEnBxC7_AXg88ryw

And then this from Germany:

In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections. 

Spike Though the Heart, Your To Blame

You give medicine a bad name...

My, my.

You've all heard about the "spike" (the red part on the virus pictured to the left).  That's the part of the Covid virus the vaccine uses your RNA to replicate.  They replicate this to fool your body into creating anti-bodies to the spike so your body attacks Covid.

But it seems there's a small detail the vaccine creators didn't think about.

Namely, the spike protein itself damages your heart (see https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2021/august/covid-19-spike-protein-binds-to-and-changes-cells-in-the-heart).

From the linked article: "There is some previous evidence to suggest that the spike protein can remain in the blood stream after the virus has gone and travel far from the site of infection. In this study, researchers only studied pericytes from the small blood vessels within the heart. However, pericytes are found within small blood vessels all over the body, including in the brain and central nervous system. This latest finding may start to help explain the effect of the virus on organs away from the site of the Covid-19 infection."

So the free spikes floating around through your body can harm you: damage your organs.

The spike is, after all, a foreign protein not created in the human body.

Even the common cold "corona virus" has spikes.  But they remain attached to the virus and don't go off running around through your body on their own:

It's almost as if the geniuses that thought up the Covid vaccines really didn't think through the "free spike" part.

Who knows what it does all by its little self left alone in your body.

Perhaps, just a theory here, some people's vaccines generate more spikes than others, or some people are more sensitive to the spike than others, and bingo - heart inflammation.

Kind of make sense when you look at the big picture.

I am pretty sure you're not going to find a study on what the spike does to you all by itself.  Sure you body may create antibodies to the spike...

But where's the research on what the spike protein itself does while circulating through your body?

Kind of like creating an mRNA vaccine that generates the proteins in snake venom...

Lose Your Job for a 31% Improvement and Kidney Failure

Readers may be interested why there is such resistance to alternate treatment therapies for Covid-19.  Why you may lose (or have lost) your job if you don't submit.  Why loved ones in the hospital for Covid-19 treatment die or have kidney or liver failure.

November, 2020

The link below 

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2020/214787Orig1s000Sumr.pdf

takes you to a summary review of the Veklury/Remdesivir FDA emergency authorization. 

CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH

APPLICATION NUMBER:

214787Orig1s000 

SUMMARY REVIEW

First off, from page 1: "Veklury should only be administered in a hospital or in a healthcare setting capable of providing acute care compatible to inpatient hospital care."

This means that treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, that can be administered by anyone anywhere, are not acceptable as they eliminate the need for expensive "inpatient hospital care."

On page 2 we see: "Clinical virology data was not submitted for the ACTT-1 trial. ... Clinical virology data was not submitted for either GS-US-540-5773 or GS-US-540-5774."

Hmmm...

And also on page 2: "RDV has an acceptable safety profile for the indicated patient population. The major safety issues identified were hepatotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions. Hepatotoxicity, manifested as an elevation in transaminase levels, was well-characterized in Phase 1 trials in healthy subjects and appears to be related to both increasing dose and longer duration of administration. In healthy subjects, the transaminase elevations do not demonstrate a clear association with other adverse events, and transaminase values returned to baseline levels after stopping the drug. No clear difference in graded transaminase levels between the RDV and placebo arms was demonstrated in the ACTT-1 trial. Hypersensitivity reactions, including infusion-related and anaphylactic reactions, have been reported during and following administration of RDV. Signs and symptoms included hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypoxia, fever, dyspnea, wheezing, angioedema, rash, nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, and shivering."

Hepatotoxicity is "chemical damage"to your liver.

But there is apparently no need to worry as "In healthy subjects, the transaminase elevations do not demonstrate a clear association with other adverse events, and transaminase values returned to baseline levels after stopping the drug."

One has to ask: How does this damage get repaired?

Page 3 brings us to this: "There are no FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. On May 1, 2020, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for RDV for the treatment of suspected or laboratory confirmed COVID-19 in adult and pediatric patients hospitalized with severe disease. On August 28, 2020, the FDA expanded the scope of the EUA to include the treatment of suspected or laboratory confirmed COVID-19 in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients irrespective of disease severity."

So if something like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine were approved or already worked for Covid-19 there would be no need for Veklury/Remdesivir.  Seems very clear why these things are taboo ("FSMB: SPREADING COVID-19 VACCINE MISINFORMATION MAY PUT MEDICAL LICENSE AT RISK" fsmb = Federation of State Medical Boards):

https://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-releases/fsmb-spreading-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-may-put-medical-license-at-risk/

"Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not."

"Information" - the correct information you must believe - comes, according to the link above, from here:  https://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/covid-19/

On page 5: "To date, the Applicant has not conducted a hepatic impairment study, renal impairment study, dedicated QT study, or any clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies" and page 10: "Renal/Hepatic Impairment: There were no dedicated studies conducted in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that hepatic or renal impairment will not affect PK of RDV. Post marketing requirements (PMRs) will be issued to conduct studies in patients with renal and hepatic impairment (see Section 13)."

So, don't worry, someday someone will look into this toxicity problem... 

Anyone here of the PMRs listed above?

On page 11 we see why the pushback was so strong on hydroxychloroquine: "Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) The antiviral activity of RDV was antagonized by chloroquine phosphate in a dose-dependent manner when the two drugs were co-incubated at clinically relevant concentrations in HEp-2 cells infected with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)" and "A warning will be included in the PI to assist in risk mitigation (see Section 12), and a PMR will be issued for the results of the assessment of the effect of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine on the antiviral activity of RDV against SARS- CoV-2 in human lung cells (see Section 13)."

If you are interested in renal failure, take a look at page 25: "A renal safety signal was identified in nonclinical studies (see Section 4); however, no evidence of renal toxicity was demonstrated in early phase clinical trials in healthy volunteers."

And, apparently, since Covid-19 damages livers (?): "Hepatic safety data from trials in COVID-19 are difficult to evaluate as hepatic injury is a common feature of COVID-19."

Given all this, then, you might no longer wonder why videos like https://rumble.com/vm936v-whistleblower-nurse-destroys-delta-narrative-vaccinated-patients-fill-hospt.html and https://www.bitchute.com/video/IC2LQQpieYl6/?fbclid=IwAR1M_nAdgt-pJU8mu7v3kOWyY0D2UnvKWyB0XIC-FuTtbV4gmz2MWMw41bQ are subject to censorship...

And this link provides an interesting perspective on what testing of this drug did relative to the "endpoint" of testing. Since Covid-19 was not well known or understood at the time of these tests what exactly was being tested in terms of recovery and affects.  

You can see that hepatotoxicity, for example, was considered to be something caused by Covid-19.  Today, with the millions of cases (if you believe in PCR) that's probably not the case.

So, long before anyone really knew anything about Covid-19 we have this (from a year ago): 

“This will be the standard of care,” Fauci, a White House advisor on the pandemic, said during comments from the Oval Office. Fauci said the results, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, prove “that a drug can block this virus.”

Compare that to this data: https://c19early.com/

Understand as well that this drug only makes an improvement, one of perhaps 31%, relative to, at the time, nothing.

Note that before the vaccine was released there was plenty of "alternative" ideas - including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (see: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.606393/full).

Yet there were not pursued in favor of big pharam...

Coronavirus: Fauci's Trail of Covidcidental Tears (Part III)

On April 24th of 2020 I wrote a piece on Fauci's involvement with GOF (Gain of Function) research at the Wuhan lab.

Of course, at that time, no one believed this.  Anyone who believed this was insane.

Today, thanks to a FOIA request, we now know the truth:  Fauci lied when he said the research did not include GOF.

Details in this excellent piece at the Conservative Tree House.

Covid: The Trend is Not Your Freind

From: https://c19vitaminc.com/ (as of 9/3/21) - see below

If you play the stock market you might hear the phrase "The trend is your friend."  And from this: "If there is one thing we can count on, investors and traders are very predictable. The bulls continue to ride the momentum higher and are probably heading for some sort of destructive ending. The bears fight the trend and the tape, losing opportunity after opportunity when it appears the market is ready to break." (Underline mine.)

Comfort is something found in many professional fields. 

Medicine, for example.  Nothing makes clearer that the story of H. pylori - the bacteria now associated with ulcers and effectively treated with antibiotics.

From the time H. pylori was discovered as a cause of ulcers until a specific antibiotic cocktail was widely accepted as a "cure" was about two decades.

Yes, two decades.

You can read the a very well written version of the story here.

Specifically: "While some researchers maintain the role of stress, a 1998 article in the British Medical Journal suggests that "psychosomatic factors in the aetiology of peptic ulcer have become unfashionable since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori". These authors hint that trends, not scientific rigor, influence etiologies. Still, while many scientists were slow to accept Marshall's discovery twenty years ago, today most doctors regard ulcer management as greatly improved thanks to Marshall and Warren's discovery."

Underline mine: Doctors follow the "trend" and not scientific rigor.

Like traders, its easy for doctors and nurses to follow the trend and not "scientific rigor."

Which takes us to this "The Conversation" article: "At my hospital, over 95% of COVID-19 patients share one thing in common: They’re unvaccinated"

Reading this article you you'll discover "The impact [of Covid] on our health care system is also difficult to quantify. Staffing, even more than beds or ventilators, is critically low."

Yet according to the AP there is an enormous glut of ventilators.  And not only was there a glut but "... by the time the new machines were being delivered to the stockpile in the early summer, most doctors were moving away from the widespread use of ventilators in all but the most critically ill COVID-19 patients due to high death rates for those put on the machines."

So what's going on here?  

Why aren't there enough ventilators?

Why are we even using the ventilators?

Perhaps the author of The Conversation article linked above is following a trend.

The wrong trend.

Still treating patients like its April of 2020...

Modern technology allows everyone to see, in real time, no less, what treatment options are available and how well they work.

For example: https://c19vitaminc.com/ shows interactively the current research outcomess on Aspirin, Bamlanivimab, Bromhexine, Budesonide, Casirivimab, Colchicine, Curcumin, Favipiravir, Fluvoxamine, Hydroxychloroquine, Iota-carragee.., Ivermectin, Melatonin, Molnupiravir, Nigella Sativa, Nitazoxanide, Povidone-Iod.., Probiotics, Proxalutamide, Quercetin, Remdesivir, Sotrovimab, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc.

Given this knowledge one would not expect to see ventilator use in any but the most extreme cases that did not respond to any of the treatments listed above.

So again, why are we using ventilators?

Because of a trend?

Maybe the "trend" is not you friend...