Here's good documentation of how fake science is created and marketed:
The scribd version of the original is here.
The original journal, after accepting and publishing the "fake" study then did this (retracted it and claimed it was never published via some controversy): Here's the cached "published" version...
In any case if you actually took the time to read through what was done you can see how easy it is to "fake" numbers. This is not new and I have written about it often over the years.
Of course, "fake" news is even easier to create as there isn't any kind of "peer review" available to screen out nonsense. At least the "fake" science world pretends to do this.
Here's a news example from Facebook. "Trump" news about leaking classified information to the president of the Philippines: (as of 5/29/17 you can find the content here http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN18K15Y - but it will probably change again.)
A game to fool the ignorant and stupid.
What more proof do you need?
Demonstrable "fake" science.
"Fake" news that edits itself (I am sure more than me pointed this out).
Good thing this was "corroborated by someone who has actually led SSBN ops" - except all the content is now gone. No one says anything about this I can find.