Miss Information Censors Your Health

I distinctly remember all those who thought it dangerous (or you were an idiot) for people to "get their medical treatment from Facebook" during the long two years of "the Covid."

Musicians, laborers, random Walmart folks in the checkout line, health care professionals, all saying you have to "trust the science" - posting "I trust the science" in various ways.  "Wear a mask or you'll kill me" was one of my favorites.

Jabbing their kids, driving unvaccinated and unmasked family members out of the house for holidays...

I wonder where all these folks got their "medical" information?

Well here's a clue: https://www.aflegal.org/news/afl-lawsuit-reveals-damning-cdc-documents-proving-government-collusion-with-big-tech-to-censor-free-speech-and-promote-biden-administration-propaganda

Turns out your favorite mindless old fool of a president and his government was directly conspiring with our dear friends at Facebook, Twitter, etc. to tell you what to think about vaccines and Covid.  

Yes, the CDC told Google, Facebook, Twitter and the like to remove your legitimate health care related posts as "misinformation."

For example:

...

Now, regular folks are not scientists and, on the other hand, they are also not stupid.  If healthy, never sick little Suzy starts bleeding out a day after her vaccination her family has the right to express legitimate concerns (microchips or not).  Her family, in the United States, are free from government control in what they speak about this event.

So, taking this particular censorship comment, let's compare it with the truth and science - from PubMed - which reveals those concerns are legitimate:

Evaluation of menstrual irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination: Results of the MECOVAC survey ... According to our data analysis, approximately 50-60% of reproductive-age women who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of administered vaccine. [emphasis mine] The occurrence of menstrual irregularities seems to be slightly higher (60-70%) after the second dose. Menstrual irregularities after both the first and second doses of the vaccine were found to self-resolve in approximately half the cases within two months. Based on these results, we suggest to consider these elements during the counselling of women who receive the COVID-19 vaccine, letting them know about the potential occurrence of temporary and self-limiting menstrual cycle irregularities in the subsequent month(s).

Note this is not a causal link but the study raises the same concerns as women were posting who were censored.  Someone experiencing real symptoms and speaking about it on one of these platforms was silenced by the Joe Biden Nancy Pelosi government.

Further, this study was conducted a year down the road from the "censoring."  So you may think the "censorship" at the time was okay since "science" showed no problems at that point in time.  

You would be wrong, however, because the government doesn't get to tell you what to think or say.  From a medical perspective the "censorship" may have caused you, for example, to take a vaccine that, given real information, you would otherwise have avoided quite legitimately.  The science may ultimately prove the censors correct, but that still doesn't give them the right to censor in the first place.

There is a dump at the AFLegal site of some hundreds of pages of similar censorship - many individual cases of censorship per page.

Twitter, Facebook, Google - they were all in on it with the CDC.

Genetic Engineering: It's What's for Dinner Again

About twelve years ago I wrote about glyphosate: Genetic Engineering: It's what's for Dinner and Palin, Genetic Engineering, and Big Business.

As a result I avoid soybean oil (as well as its friends like Canola) like the plague that they are.

I also wrote: "Perhaps without full and complete understanding GM modifications like Roundup Ready could be dangerous in some unknown way.  (Given the large percentage of introns in genes relative to protein encoding I think makes this even more dangerous.)

Humanity as a whole has not done a very good job with that sort of thing, e.g., thalidomide, Celebrex and all the other wondrous creations withdrawn from market.  Weren't they all "approved" at some point only to later discover that the approval was perhaps granted to hastily?"

Hmmm, sound familiar Mr. FDA?  Like some recently pushed injectable products..?

Then there is The Soul of a New Disease I wrote around the same time:

And then we get to the money shot (from The Soul of a New Disease):

"In August of this year, an article in the British Medical Journal noted that in the wake of the new classification, prehypertension is emerging as a potential goldmine for drug companies [ emphasis mine ], and pointed out that many physicians who were members of the committee have disclosed financial relationships to industry.

One of the committee members named in the article is George Bakris, director of the Hypertension Center at the University of Chicago, who has disclosed consulting arrangements with several drug companies. Bakris, for his part, tells the Health Blog that the committee’s decision had nothing to do with drug-company interests, and was meant to educate and empower patients."

No, no, Tony, you're safe, nothing to see here...

And then today I came upon ‘Systemic Catastrophe:’ MIT Senior Researcher Warns Glyphosate is a Slow Kill over at Epoch Times.

The author, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, "... believes that the pervasive use of glyphosate in the United States and around the world in agriculture is the reason behind the dramatic increase in autism, diabetes, cancer, allergies, as well as many other chronic conditions."

Imagine that!

Some of Dr. Seneff's slides:

Same old tired paradigm of profit on death and disease.

Note that Dr. Seneff isn't a youngster.  No youngster (including their spouse, children, parents, and so on) hoping to ever have a job could publish something like this.

Why?

Retaliation.  She's old and probably actually cares about the truth rather than a job (I can hear the colleagues now: "Crazy old bat!" "Fool!" - all the while driving their little Suzy's and Johnny's to the Dr. for - wait for it - cancer, diabetes, allergies, and so on.) (Sorry Dr. Seneff!)

Then there's this: More Monsanto Roundup Problems: Its in Your Urine.

"Now, results from a German study shows that people who have no direct contact with agriculture have significant concentrations of glyphosate in their urine. It's becoming quite apparent that genetically engineered crops are a source of multiple toxins, in addition to having been found to contain far lower levels of nutrients. So much for saving the world from starvation. "

Safe and effective...  I wonder why they sold it to the Nazi's Bayer....?

Perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps glyphosate is only a poison.

Perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps it's both a poison and a genetically active in your body.

Oh well, gotta go, time to take little Suzy and Johnny to the allergist/cancer specialist/autism/diabetes specialist.