Joseph Goebbels Brings Ethylene Oxide Truth to Covid

 I recently came upon the video linked here:

This video is about Ethylene Oxide (EO).  This is a carcinogenic gas used to sterilize the cotton swabs used for taking Covid samples high up in your nasal cavity.

The claim here is that EO is not good for you, and, as this woman says, Youtube believes that knowing this is bad for you so they took down her video.

USA Today, for example, takes a hit at these claims.

Basically they agree with the fact that EO is a carcinogen, its bad for you, and so on.  But at the very end of the article they say: "For the gas to be hazardous to us humans, we would need to be exposed to high concentrations of it for long enough periods of time, not from the occasional use of a swab, Batterman said."

So let's see what dear old OSHA says about the exposure (link here): "Employee exposure is limited to one part EtO per million parts of air (1 ppm) measured as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA). Employee exposure may not exceed the short-term excursion limit of 5 ppm EtO averaged over any 15-minute sampling period. These limits are called permissible exposure limits (PELs)."

Yet this paper points out that the swabs should not be used in the nasal cavity for at least five (5) weeks after sterilization. 

And USA Today, in the same article, says: "there's likely hardly a trace of (ethylene oxide) remaining," Stuart Batterman, an environmental health sciences professor at the University of Michigan, told FactCheck.org in June."

The operative words here are "likely hardly a trace."

Is this a scientific term like 1ppm?

I think not.

There are many other "fact check" articles out there as well, all vaguely covering the same idea: see this at AP for example.

The problem is that these swabs come from China.

How are they made there?

What sway the the FDA have over the manufacturers there?  Probably not much.

Does anyone actually check these swabs, as the are imported by the millions, that they conform to proper sterilization protocols?

Probably not.

Should you feel safe with all this...?

Probably not.

Are the "fact checkers" really checking the fact?

No.

An actual fact check you question the various sources as well as actually examine wha is coming into the US from China.

Otherwise its all just a statement from Orwell's "Ministry of Truth..."

Joseph Goebbels Brings Truth to Covid

To the left is a Nazi book burning (curtesy of Wikipedia).  Again, curtesy of Wikipedia: "Meanwhile, the Nazi Party began passing laws to marginalise Jews the unvaccinated and remove them from German modern society."

All you will hear in the media is what you are supposed to think.  Not what is true, not what contradicts what you should think of as true, nor any other "subversive" thought or idea.

My comments here are echoed all over the world.

People are rightfully suspicious when they are told of powerful, world-sweeping, magic solutions to problems they didn't know they had.

None the less today I came across this jewel of science scientism under "Google News":

Link here.

Sounds grime, doesn't it.  

There's even a supporting diagram ostensibly show how the spew from the teachers mouth infected a cluster of students sitting up front in the class room:

Here's the corresponding CDC report.

The basic idea is that the teacher had covid, talked to the class for a week, and then everybody in the blue boxes (filled in or outlined in blue) got "Covid."

What's interesting is this paragraph in the "Discussion" section: "The findings in this study are subject to at least three limitations. First, the teacher’s specimen was unavailable for WGS, which prevented phylogenetic identification of the outbreak’s index patient. Second, testing for parents and siblings was self-directed and took place mostly outside the school setting, which could have led to under ascertainment of cases. Finally, challenges in testing acceptance among possible contacts from outside the school led to difficulty in characterizing the outbreak’s actual spread into the community, as is evidenced by later discovery of additional community cases with sequences indistinguishable from those in the school outbreak."

The article also claims "The attack rate in the two rows seated closest to the teacher’s desk was 80% (eight of 10) and was 28% (four of 14) in the three back rows (Fisher’s exact test; p = 0.036)."  So one imagines the teach sat at her desk all day long spewing Covid on the students.

Yet the teacher's WGS (whole genome sequencing) results were "unavailable."  In simple English we don't know what made the teacher sick - could have been Covid, could have been flu, could have been anything else.

Yet the NBC headline says:

So this is simply false, at least as far as the contents of the article are concerned.

Apparently no one in the teachers lounge, lunch room or anywhere else the teacher went throughout the day got sick.

What kind of tests were used?  

Probably PCR tests... at least when "family (parents, siblings according to the article" did the tests.

According to the NYT (link here) PCR tests are not reliable.  As you will recall goats, pawpaw and Coca Cola all test positive for Covid (see this and this).  NOTE: Fact checking says the Austrian Coca Cola test was done incorrectly and, not surprisingly, produced a "positive" result.  Of course, of the hundreds of millions of Covid tests this would be the single case of someone using the test incorrectly.

So this article is clearly "propaganda" - not science but scientism.

Much like the Ministry of Truth in Orwell's 1984 NBC serves to promoting the "agenda" you are to follow.

And Facebook, the "fact checkers", etc. etc. are just like the Joseph Goebbels of Nazi Germany.  Conducting a "book burning" of books, articles and other content deemed to be "false."

Covid: "inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory"

This email (BuzzFeed FIOA via The Last Refuge) also says the genome of SARS-CoV-2 appears “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory:”

 

Fauci's Own Email's on Masks...

 Link here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561-leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails

And yes, don't wear one....

Coronavirus: Fauci's Trail of Covidcidental Tears (Part II)

The party continues...

Please pardon the lull.  

There's been little value writing about things which are censored to non-existence.

More than a year ago I wrote "Coronavirus: Fauci's Covidcidental Trail of Tears."

Today we hear from National Review and the WaPO essentially the same story: Coronavirus (now Covid-19) is a product of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control.

Jim Geraghty at National Review lays things out very nicely...  well worth the read.

I wonder how much else that was censored away is actually fact?

Time will tell how much "science" has been "decided..."

How the Pfizer Vaccine Alters your Cells

From the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download - So how does it work?

Simple: RNA from the vaccine enters your cells and your cells manufacture P2 S - a mutant of the virus.  The mutant P2 S is incorporated by your cells into their membranes.  You body sees these mutants and develops an immune response.  The P2 S contains the "spike" which allows your immune system to recognize the Covid-19 "spike."

Note that your DNA is not altered.  But presumably all the cells the vaccines enter are (otherwise they couldn't manufacture the PS 2.

Are these types of vaccine safe or proven historically?  No.

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906799/) "mRNA vaccines represent a promising alternative to conventional vaccine approaches because of their high potency, capacity for rapid development and potential for low-cost manufacture and safe administration. However, their application has until recently been restricted by the instability and inefficient in vivo delivery of mRNA. ..."

You decide...

PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE (BNT162, PF-07302048)

VACCINES AND RELATED BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

BRIEFING DOCUMENT

MEETING DATE: 10 December 2020

Page 11:

2.2. RNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Formulation

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is based on an RNA-LNP platform of nucleoside modified RNA, which has blunted innate immune sensor activating capacity and thus augmented antigen expression. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, BNT162b2 (30 µg), encodes a P2 mutant S (P2 S) and is formulated in LNPs. Encapsulation into LNPs enables transfection of the RNA into host cells after intramuscular (IM) injection. These LNPs are composed of four different lipids in a defined ratio. During mixing of the RNA and the dissolved lipids, the lipids form the nanoparticles encapsulating the RNA. After injection, the LNPs are taken up by the cells, and the RNA is released into the cytosol. In the cytosol, the RNA is translated to the encoded viral protein. The P2 S antigen incorporates into cellular membranes and induces an adaptive immune response. As S is the antigen that recognizes ACE2 and enables infection of the host cells, it is a key target of virus neutralizing antibodies. Furthermore, as RNA-expressed S is fragmented intracellularly, the resulting peptides can be presented at the cell surface, triggering a specific T cell-mediated immune response with activity against the virus.

cy·to·sol - the aqueous component of the cytoplasm of a cell, within which various organelles and particles are suspended.

Translation is the process by which a protein is synthesized from the information contained in a molecule of messenger RNA (mRNA).

Covid On Trial: Tunnelton Inn vs PA LCB

Statement of Interest

If you are a bar or restaurant/bar owner in Pennsylvania with an LCB license you now have an opportunity to assist your fellow restaurant/bar/business/musicians/staff/etc. (this may well apply to Hair Salons, Gyms, etc.) owners in getting out from under little Tommy Wolf’s “Covid Orders.”

The underlying basis for the Tunnelton case is that the “Covid” orders are unconstitutional: there is no “law” involved and the government cannot enforce anything but law.  The Tunnelton Inn's contention is Wolf simply made up “orders” and then tried to get everyone believe he made law without the PA Legislature.  

Now little Tommy himself refused to go along with losing his Covid powers in June, 2020 (see: https://www.pennlive.com/news/2020/06/lawmakers-vote-to-end-pennsylvanias-covid-19-emergency-disaster-but-gov-wolf-says-its-not-over.html)

Little Tommy's “Covid powers" come from a law that also allows the legislature to take them away by their vote - minus Wolf’s involvement.  Wolf argued successfully that "law" only occurs when both legislature and governor act together.  So, little Tommy, why doesn’t your standard apply to everyone else regarding Covid orders - they are not law if the legislature does not pass them (recall Wolf marching at a BLM rally when he had forbidden gatherings that large)?

Attached to this post is a “Verified Statement of Interest” - as a Pennsylvania Bar or Bar/Restaruant owner please consider signing it if you believe in law and the Constitution of the United States.

If you do sign it email (or a picture of it signed) it to Eric (see below).  You can also fax or USPS mail it as well.

The goal here is to convince the judge that a ruling is needed and not to let the PALCB simply walk away from the case.

Though understand: By them walking away the Tunnelton Inn wins.  And anyone else with a shutdown order can easily get into the same position (using Eric/EAT) to shut them down.

I believe the problem they face is should the PALCB lose then all of little Tommy’s orders will not only be unconstitutional (via the Stickman case brought by Butler County businesses) but also there will be case law showing they are not law.

This case is made possible by Entrepreneurs Against Tyranny (EAT https://www.facebook.com/eatfreepa) - See Facebook and "Taste of Sicily" - Taste of Sicily took the PA Health Department to court via EAT and won.

[[ COMMUNICATION FROM TUNNELTON INN LAWYER (Eric)  TO Entrepreneurs Against Tyranny (Mike) ]]]

Mike,

Please distribute this e-mail to anyone you think may be interested.

As we discussed, I represent Tunnelton Inn in Indiana County. Tunnelton Inn has given me permission to publicly discuss their situation.

Tunnelton Inn is owned by a married couple, Donna and Todd Kueny. Their liquor license is owned by a company- Falcornetix.

Tunnelton Inn has chosen not to follow  the COVID-19 orders. 

On November 2, 2020, the PLCB issued a 14 day suspension Notice to the Tunnelton Inn. On November 3, 2020, we filed an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County. The Court issued a supersedeas, which meant that Tunnelton Inn did not have to close. A trial is presently set for December 18, 2020.

On December 3, 2020, a received a call from PLCB who stated that they would be withdrawing their suspension notice. While that is a partial victory, it does not resolve the underlying legal question. Tunnelton Inn and I have discussed the situation and they would like to get the Court to rule on the underlying legal issues.

Even if a party tries to withdraw a case, it is still possible to get a court to rule on legal issues if you can demonstrate that an issue is of great public importance and is capable of repetition yet evading review.

I need to be able to demonstrate to the Court in Indiana County that this is an issue of great public importance. The court could still use its discretion and refuse to hear the issue, but I want to give the Court as little wiggle room as possible.

I believe the best way to do so is to get as many liquor license holders as possible to sign a statement that this is of importance to them.

I am attaching a proposed verification form. Could you please circulate this to any  interested parties and return to me. This can be returned to me by fax or e-mail.

This form is not legally binding in any way. All that it states is that the signer understands the issue, believes it to be important and would like the court to rule on it.

Please have people contact me with any questions.

Eric Winter, Esq.
Prince Law Offices, P.C.
646 Lenape Rd
Bechtelsville, PA 19505
888-313-0416
610-845-3903 (fax)